CRAN Package Check Results for Package nanop

Last updated on 2022-09-27 21:53:55 CEST.

Flavor Version Tinstall Tcheck Ttotal Status Flags
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang 2.0-6 10.35 66.37 76.72 OK
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc 2.0-6 8.67 48.96 57.63 OK
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang 2.0-6 107.90 WARN
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc 2.0-6 108.64 NOTE
r-devel-windows-x86_64 2.0-6 17.00 90.00 107.00 OK
r-patched-linux-x86_64 2.0-6 7.42 63.53 70.95 OK
r-release-linux-x86_64 2.0-6 8.34 61.99 70.33 OK
r-release-macos-arm64 2.0-6 31.00 OK
r-release-macos-x86_64 2.0-6 39.00 OK
r-release-windows-x86_64 2.0-6 19.00 91.00 110.00 OK
r-oldrel-macos-arm64 2.0-6 40.00 OK
r-oldrel-macos-x86_64 2.0-6 47.00 OK
r-oldrel-windows-ix86+x86_64 2.0-6 22.00 115.00 137.00 OK

Additional issues

clang15 clang15

Check Details

Version: 2.0-6
Check: whether package can be installed
Result: WARN
    Found the following significant warnings:
     pdf_debye.c:1039:162: warning: invalid UTF-8 in comment [-Winvalid-utf8]
Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang

Version: 2.0-6
Check: compiled code
Result: NOTE
    File ‘nanop/libs/nanop.so’:
     Found no calls to: ‘R_registerRoutines’, ‘R_useDynamicSymbols’
    
    It is good practice to register native routines and to disable symbol
    search.
    
    See ‘Writing portable packages’ in the ‘Writing R Extensions’ manual.
Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc