Visualizing meta-analytic data with R package metaviz

Michael Kossmeier, Ulrich S. Tran, and Martin Voracek (Department of Basic Psychological Research and Research Methods, School of Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria)

2018-03-16

The R package metaviz is a collection of functions to create visually appealing and information-rich plots of meta-analytic data using ggplot2. Currently functions to create several variants of forest plots (viz_forest), funnel plots (viz_forest), and to conduct visual funnel plots inference (funnelinf) are provided. See the function documentations for more details and relevant references.

This vignette is a tutorial for the use of metaviz and presents some of its main features.

In the following, we use three different example datasets distributed with the package metaviz. The dataset mozart includes a published meta-analysis using the Cohen d metric (Pietschnig, Voracek, & Formann, 2010), brainvol contains data for a meta-analysis using correlation coefficients (Pietschnig et al., 2015), and exrehab contains data of a published meta-analysis with dichotomous outcomes and risk ratios as effect size (Anderson et al. 2016). More details can be found in the respective help files (help(mozart), help(brainvol), help(exrehab)).

The main input of functions in package metaviz is a data.frame or matrix with the study effect sizes in the first column and the respective standard errors in the second column. Alternatively, the output of the function rma.uni from R package metafor can be supplied as input, then effect sizes and standard errors are taken from there.

First, the R package metaviz needs to be installed and attached within the R environment.

library(metaviz)

Creating forest plots with function viz_forest

The viz_forest function is the main function in metaviz to create forest plots and their variants. Many options to visually customize the forest plot are provided (see help(viz_forest))

viz_forest(x = mozart[1:10, c("d", "se")], study_labels = mozart[1:10, c("study_name")],
           summary_label = "Summary effect", xlab = "Cohen d")

Forest plot variants: rainforest plot and thick forest plots

In addition to traditional forest plots, rainforest plots as well as the thick forest plots can be created via the variant argument. Rainforest and thick forest plots are two variants and enhancements of the classical forest plot recently proposed by Schild and Voracek (2015). Both variants give visually emphasize large studies (with short confidence intervals and more weight in the meta-analysis), while small studies (with wide confidence intervals and less weight in the meta-analysis) are visually less dominant. For further details see help(viz_rainforest) and help(viz_thickforest).

The method argument controls the meta-analytic model (fixed effect or random effects model). Setting method from a fixed effect to a random effects model changes the estimated summary effect and meta-analytic (inverse-variance) weights assigned to each study accordingly.

Subgroup analysis

The viz_forest function is able to use a categorical moderator variable to visualize a subgroup analysis. This is done via the group argument, a factor which corresponds to the subgroup membership of each study. We use the dichotomous moderator rr_lab to compute and visualize separate meta-analyses. In the case of subgroup analysis, the summary_label argument can be a vector containing names for all subgroups, arranged in the order of the levels of group.

Available forest plots types: Cumulative and leave-one-out analysis.

Different aspects of meta-analytic data can be shown in forest plots. Within function viz_forest the type parameter controls which aspects are shown. Two examples are given below.

Argument type = "cumulative" shows a cumulative meta-analysis, that is, meta-analytic summary effects are computed sequentially by adding each study one-by-one.

Argument type = "sensitivity" shows a leave-one-out analysis. That is, for each study the meta-analytic summary effect is shown if that particular study is not considered in the computation of the summary effect.

Aligning tables with study and/or summary information

The viz_forest function was developed to allow aligning a table to the forest plot containing study or summary information. First, textual annotations of effect sizes and confidence intervals can be optionally displayed with the argument annotate_CI = TRUE.

Second, arbitrary study information can be supplied as data.frame with the argument study_table. This data.frame can contain several variables to be aligned as columns and should contain one row for each study in the meta-analysis.

To illustrate, we might want to align a table with the study identifiers and number of events observed in each study of data set exrehab.

##              name eventsT eventsC
## 1 Shaw (NEDHP) 81 109/323 113/328
## 2        Lewin 92    9/58   18/58
## 3      Haskell 94  62/145  72/155
## 4       Englom 96  26/102   34/91
## 5  Hofman-Bang 99   19/46   21/41
## 6 Belardinelli 01   11/59   21/59

We might also want to include the sum of all events as summary information. This can be done with the summary_table argument. summary_table should be a data.frame with the number of rows equal to the number of subgroups.

##      name  eventsT  eventsC
## 1 Summary 407/1471 453/1388

The table_headers of study_table and summary_table can be specified with table_headers.

The spacing of the forest plot and aligned tables can be customized by supplying a layout matrix via table_layout.

Transforming the x axis labels

For some transformed effect sizes (e.g., log odds ratios, log risk ratios, or Fisher’s z) it is good practice to transform the labels of the x-axis, such that they display the effect sizes on their original scale (e.g., odds, ratios, risk ratios, or correlations). This can be conveniently done with the argument x_trans_function.

Creating funnel plots with viz_funnel

The function viz_funnel is capable to create a large set of different funnel plot variants. Options for several graphical augmentations (e.g., confidence, significance, and additional evidence contours; choice of the ordinate; showing study subgroups), and different statistical information displayed are provided (Egger’s regression line, and imputed studies by, as well as the adjusted summary effect from, the trim-and-fill method). See help(viz_funnel) for further details and relevant references.

By default, significance contours (for the 5% and 1% level) and 95% confidence contours (fixed effect model) are shown.

viz_funnel(brainvol[, c("z", "z_se")])

In the brainvol meta-analysis Fisher’s z values are used. It is convenient to show Fisher’s z values on their original scale (correlations) using the x_trans_function. The meta-analytic model can be changed to a random effects model using method.

viz_funnel(brainvol[, c("z", "z_se")],
           method = "DL",
           contours_col = "Greys",
           xlab = "r", x_trans_function = tanh, 
           x_breaks = atanh(c(-0.9, -0.7, -0.3, 0, 0.3, 0.7, 0.9)))

Trim-and-fill analysis, Egger’s regression

Showing imputed studies by the trim and fill method, the adjusted summary effect, as well as egger’s regression line can help to visually assess funnel plot asymmetry.

Additional evidence contours

Additional evidence contours can help to assess the robustness of the meta-analytic result. These contours show the effect of one hypothetical new study (with a certain effect size and standard error) on the significance of the updated meta-analytic summary effect (given a certain method).

References

Anderson, L., Oldridge, N., Thompson, D. R., Zwisler, A. D., Rees, K., Martin, N., & Taylor, R. S. (2016). Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 67, 1-12.

Pietschnig, J., Penke, L., Wicherts, J. M., Zeiler, M., & Voracek, M. (2015). Meta-analysis of associations between human brain volume and intelligence differences: How strong are they and what do they mean? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 57, 411-432.

Pietschnig, J., Voracek, M., & Formann, A. K. (2010). Mozart effect-Shmozart effect: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 38, 314-323.

Schild, A. H., & Voracek, M. (2015). Finding your way out of the forest without a trail of bread crumbs: Development and evaluation of two novel displays of forest plots. Research Synthesis Methods, 6, 74-86.

Contact

Questions, ideas, criticism: michael.kossmeier@univie.ac.at.